Yesterday I spoke with Dane Wiggington, a returning guest and founder of Geoengineering Watch. Many of you may already follow him on Instagram and YouTube, where he provides insightful analysis on climate manipulation and its impacts. In this interview, we're taking a closer look at Hurricane Helene and discussing whether its formation and path were natural or intentionally manipulated. We'll dive into what Dane refers to as toxic interventions in our skies, and he will break down some of the most alarming signs that this storm may not have been purely nature's doing.
Before we dive into Dane’s interview, I want to let you know that I am aware of, and will be covering in upcoming videos, these curious connections to the destruction in NC:
👉 Lithium deposits in King’s Mountain and Gaston County
👉 Quartz, mica and other mineral resources in the Spruce Pine Mine
👉 NC Governor’s desire to create “10-minute cities” in major metropolitan areas
As you know, there are often multiple “benefits” the evil-doers can exploit in the aftermath of these disasters (whether natural or not). Stay tuned for more on those topics coming up!
For now, here are some key points from Dane’s video ‘Hurricane Helene And Frequency Transmissions, 90 Second Alert:’
Circular blue flashes seen in the video are believed to be frequency transmissions
Evidence suggests that atmospheric frequency transmissions can repel air masses, especially when they contain electrically conductive nanoparticles.
Brighter blue flashes indicate stronger transmissions, leading to a more pronounced repelling effect on storms in the vicinity.
In areas without blue flashes, there is no transmission, and storms can move freely in those directions.
So this raises the question: Was Hurricane Helen's path and behavior simply the result of natural climate processes, or was it engineered through intentional atmospheric manipulation?
Friends, this information is best listened to, so here you go:
Read Next:
Share this post