When I was a kid, we were warned not to play with plastic bags (gee, like we would!) because having a piece of plastic over your nose and mouth could cause suffocation and death.
But thatāe EXACTLY what the nitwits at several CA health agencies want you to do: cover your only two airways (nose and mouth) with a piece of plastic, also known as a surgical mask.
Problem is: I have a medical condition that precludes this. Itās called breathing. Yep, and my condition is covered under state and federal ADA laws, which state I cannot be discriminated against due to my condition.
(If you need help standing your ground, order this exemption document we created for you, which educates and informs others of your right to breathe, and to remain unjabbed and unpoked. We have one for every state, listing the state and federal laws that protect you from being discriminated against. Iāve also done a deep dive video and substack for you here, explaining how to use this document, especially in healthcare settings.)
So guess which part of California is trotting out the olā suffocation devices again?
It seems the San Francisco Bay Area is at it again, bringing back the dreaded masks.
Please ā donāt call them mask mandates ā that phrase is incorrect (only a judge can mandate an action, and that has to be in line with a LAW.) These mask requirements are illegal, unconstitutional policies. The more people use the phrase āmask mandateā the more it sticks. Letās UNSTICK it, shall we?!
No surprises here. This feels like a rerun of the same exhausting cycle and itās only going to end when the people stop complying and stand up for their rights. During the height of the hogwash, I helped countless people in the Bay Area navigate through the confusion and overreach, supporting those who were simply trying to exercise their rights to make personal decisions ā Gee, what a concept? These folks were just trying to prevent their most basic rights from being trampled.
Now, as they roll out these mandates again, theyāre starting with healthcare workers in the Bay Area countiesāNapa, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, Alameda, and San Mateoā¦ and the slow suffocation will spread. Hereās the thing: If you want to wear a mask, thatās your decision, but it shouldnāt come at the expense of taking away someone elseās freedom.
Imagine if your employer decided that everyone must get a tattoo or that the entire office had to start smoking because some health official declared itās good for productivity. It sounds ridiculous, but this is the kind of slippery slope weāre looking at.
These Northern California counties are gearing up for requirements that only apply to healthcare workersājust the workers, not the patients, not the visitors, not even the maintenance staff. How does that make any sense? Either youāre protecting everyone, or youāre not.
Come on, if you're going to play the "we care about public health" card, at least make it convincing.
Theyāll tell you it's all about preventing the spread of the latest cooties. But all the evidence out there doesn't exactly scream "life-saving." In fact, the FDA even had a statement saying that neither N95s nor surgical masks actually prevent illness. Yep, you heard me right. I even pointed it out in a video years agoāuntil, of course, the page got conveniently scrubbed from the site. Funny how that happens.
Newsflash: MASKS DONāT WORK
In 2020, I went to CVS and did a little experiment. I grabbed a mask off the shelf, flipped it over, and guess what? The back of the package said it doesnāt protect against any illness, airborne or otherwise. So, Iām staring at this packaging, thinking, āThis is the best joke Iāve seen all year,ā and by 2020 standards, thatās saying something. But itās written right there in black and whiteā¦ and FACTS are a thing that can be provenāunlike the fantasy land where some health officers seem to live.
SaveCalifornia account on Instagram compiled these studies:
An April 2023 German study revealed that "using a face mask during pregnancy may increase the chance of stillbirth, testicular dysfunction, and cognitive decline in children."
An Aug. 2023 South Korea study "suggests the āgold standardā surgical N95 masks may expose users to dangerous levels of toxic chemicals."
An April 2021 study done under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) "showed that masks do absolutely nothing to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and their use is even harmful."
In Sept. 2023, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) "released a statement challenging the effectiveness and ethicality of mask mandates for respiratory viruses, including COVID-19. The AAPS argues that not only are these mandates ineffective in stopping the spread of respiratory viruses, but they also pose potential health risks and infringe upon individualsā rights to informed medical consent."
The AAPS statement also delved into the potential harm that can result from prolonged mask usage. Drawing on over 60 studies and reports, it listed several areas of concern:
Prolonged use of mask is not a neutral event and in fact can cause harm. āProlonged use of N95 and surgical masks by healthcare professionals during COVID-19 has caused adverse effects such as headaches, rash, acne, skin breakdown, and impaired cognition in the majority of those surveyed.ā
Findings indicate that wearing the N95 mask for 14 hours significantly affected the physiological, biochemical, and perception parameters in a negative fashion.
The possibility that masks hinder the acquisition of speech and language in children exists. āOverall, the research to date demonstrates that the visible articulations that babies normally see when others are talking play a key role in their acquisition of communication skills."
Despite all this evidence proving the inefficacy and harms of masks for the general public, starting November 1st and continuing through April 2025, the mask requirements will return in these Bay Area counties (because apparently, viruses follow a strict calendar now.) They roll it out for healthcare workers first, but donāt be surprised when it creeps into your local restaurants, Ubers, and grocery stores. Incrementalism at its finest.
Oh, and speaking of incrementalism, this whole thing is conditioning you to jump when the health officer says so. Theyāre conditioning you to fall in line with every new order they roll out, as if these health officers have the power to control your personal health decisions. The reality is that health officers can recommend public measures, but they canāt control individual behavior beyond those recommendations.
Sure, they can issue an order, but guess what? In California, that order is only good for seven days. After that, your lovely county Board of Stupidvisors ahem, Supervisors has to vote to keep it going. Yep, just five people deciding for millions based on circumstantial evidence at best and zero evidence at worst.
FDA Facts on Masks
Weāve all seen this type of mask before ^ You know, the same mask that is always dangling from a rearview mirror, shoved in a pocket, crumpled in a purse, or hanging around someoneās chin? Super sanitary, right?
Hereās a fun fact: according to the FDA, most masks, like those disposable ones people use endlessly, are meant for one-time use. Yes, thatās rightādisposable.
Now, I may not be your English teacher, but I am an English teacher. Letās have a little vocabulary moment with the word disposable, shall we?
Go ahead, think of an adjective for it. Iāll waitā¦
Does it mean you rotate it between your pocket, chin, and car dashboard for weeks? Nope! Disposable is like a Kleenexāyou use it once, then toss it out. You wouldnāt blow your nose in a tissue, stuff it in your pocket, and pull it out for round two, and three... would you?
And speaking of Kleenex, when I sneeze, Iāll gladly oblige humanity by using one. I might even cough into it. Then, like a decent person, I throw it away, rather than wear it on my face for hours. Iām just following the logic here!
The FDA classifies masks as loose-fitting devices, designed to create a barrier between your mouth and nose and potential contaminants. Most of these masks arenāt regulated for medical use. They're not designed to form a proper seal around your nose and mouth. Thatās where the fancy N95s come in.
Hereās the punchline about N95 masks: you have to be fitted for one. You canāt just slap it on and call it a day. In hospitals, they actually do a whole fit test to make sure it works properly and that the person can tolerate it. Iāve never been through one, and frankly, I donāt plan to, but I imagine theyāre checking your heart rate, oxygen levels, and whether youāre about to pass out from lack of air. You know, key indicators that maybeājust maybeāyou canāt tolerate wearing it.
And guess what? If you have any respiratory or heart issues, or just general trouble breathing, the FDA recommends you consult a healthcare provider before using an N95. Why? Because it can make it harder to BREATHE. Ironic, right? Weāre talking about an alleged respiratory virus, which has the potential to make breathing difficult, and the solution is... something that makes breathing even more difficult?
Even the FDA spells it out, folks, with all those big, important adjectives: SPECIFICALLY, SINGLE-USE, DISPOSABLE respiratory protective devices worn by healthcare personnel DURING PROCEDURES.
Let's pause for dramatic effect on "disposable" again. These things are designed for a one-time show, not a daily marathon. A healthcare worker should not be wearing the same mask repeatedly? AND āduring proceduresāānot while they're strolling the halls or in the break room!
But of course, some of these healthcare systems have policies in place that if youāre in the break room, your office, or the cafeteriaāno mask required. Because, naturally, the cooties know better than to enter these sacred spaces. Itās genius. Truly. I mean, viruses are apparently smart enough to avoid areas where youāre buying a Snickers bar or printing out medical records.
Oh, and letās not forgetāif youāre one of the many who lined up for the ācocktail,ā you still have to cover up.
All snark aside, in response to your boss telling you to mask up, why not offer to do one better? Instead of masking up, tell your boss youāll just stay home when youāre feeling unwell. If youāre sick, just stay home. Thatās my revolutionary advice.
But if you do go to work, maybe you should ask for a list of all the people youāve supposedly infected in the past few years so you can send out some heartfelt condolence cards.
Remember, these health officers donāt have the power to run your life. They canāt stop you from not wearing a mask if thatās your choice. At the end of the day, itās your health, your body, and your decision. But, of course, theyāll keep pushing until you give in. The question is: will you? How much of your freedom are you willing to hand over?
My son was severely punished by his āCatholicā high school in a Feb 22 mask protest. His video of kids cheering went viral and was reposted by conservatives. The school publicly shamed him and after 6 weeks when the isolation and shame was too much we had to withdraw him from the school. My one regret is going along with the hogwash for 300 days but it was the only way to try and keep our lives as normal as possible and it was anything but normal. I lost a lot of āfriendsā and coaches, teammates and 95% of the people we associated with never spoke to us again. The blind disregard for facts and truth and the adherence to a political agenda was appalling. I pray daily that the evil doers at St. Viator HS in Arlington Heights, Illinois and the community members who allowed public shaming of students are held accountable by God. I never want to see this happen again. As a parent I still deal with the trauma daily and although my son is a functioning college student today, itās been a long, painful road.
Excellent post, Peggy!
I was a volunteer On Call Chaplain at our Advent Hospital until the scamdemic. Even though being a "Christian" hospital chain, Advent fell hook line and sinker along with the rules and policies implemented by the compromised medical system. I digress.
Before the scamdemic, the hospital implemented "flu season" policies which meant getting "flu season" vaccines and wearing the masks during "flu season" when visiting patients. I objected to both, so I would be scheduled for up until the "flu season" began (early Fall) and would begin to be scheduled again when the "flu season" was over (late Winter).
When the scamdemic was declared, all volunteer Chaplains were released from duties and only the small paid Chaplain staff was kept on duty. I found that reprehensible. Not only were people being needlessly killed by egregious "unscientific hospital protocols" in medical treatment, and patients were being denied necessary personal advocacy, but chaplain care was cut by 2/3!!!
When it was determined, nearly a year and a half later, that the hospital could welcome the On Call Chaplains back with open arms, you can imagine the type of letter that the Chaplain Supervisor and Hospital Administrator received from me. I shall never serve in a government regulated hospital again. For those who can, I fully support as they follow, in obedience, God's leading in their lives.
It saddens and sickens me to think of the needless horror inflicted on sick and dying fellow human beings in our nation and the world simply because people trusted "science" instead of the Lord.