When I was a kid, we were warned not to play with plastic bags (gee, like we would!) because having a piece of plastic over your nose and mouth could cause suffocation and death.
But thatāe EXACTLY what the nitwits at several CA health agencies want you to do: cover your only two airways (nose and mouth) with a piece of plastic, also known as a surgical mask.
Problem is: I have a medical condition that precludes this. Itās called breathing. Yep, and my condition is covered under state and federal ADA laws, which state I cannot be discriminated against due to my condition.
(If you need help standing your ground, order this exemption document we created for you, which educates and informs others of your right to breathe, and to remain unjabbed and unpoked. We have one for every state, listing the state and federal laws that protect you from being discriminated against. Iāve also done a deep dive video and substack for you here, explaining how to use this document, especially in healthcare settings.)
So guess which part of California is trotting out the olā suffocation devices again?
It seems the San Francisco Bay Area is at it again, bringing back the dreaded masks.
Please ā donāt call them mask mandates ā that phrase is incorrect (only a judge can mandate an action, and that has to be in line with a LAW.) These mask requirements are illegal, unconstitutional policies. The more people use the phrase āmask mandateā the more it sticks. Letās UNSTICK it, shall we?!
No surprises here. This feels like a rerun of the same exhausting cycle and itās only going to end when the people stop complying and stand up for their rights. During the height of the hogwash, I helped countless people in the Bay Area navigate through the confusion and overreach, supporting those who were simply trying to exercise their rights to make personal decisions ā Gee, what a concept? These folks were just trying to prevent their most basic rights from being trampled.
Now, as they roll out these mandates again, theyāre starting with healthcare workers in the Bay Area countiesāNapa, Contra Costa, Santa Clara, Alameda, and San Mateoā¦ and the slow suffocation will spread. Hereās the thing: If you want to wear a mask, thatās your decision, but it shouldnāt come at the expense of taking away someone elseās freedom.
Imagine if your employer decided that everyone must get a tattoo or that the entire office had to start smoking because some health official declared itās good for productivity. It sounds ridiculous, but this is the kind of slippery slope weāre looking at.
These Northern California counties are gearing up for requirements that only apply to healthcare workersājust the workers, not the patients, not the visitors, not even the maintenance staff. How does that make any sense? Either youāre protecting everyone, or youāre not.
Come on, if you're going to play the "we care about public health" card, at least make it convincing.
Theyāll tell you it's all about preventing the spread of the latest cooties. But all the evidence out there doesn't exactly scream "life-saving." In fact, the FDA even had a statement saying that neither N95s nor surgical masks actually prevent illness. Yep, you heard me right. I even pointed it out in a video years agoāuntil, of course, the page got conveniently scrubbed from the site. Funny how that happens.
Newsflash: MASKS DONāT WORK
In 2020, I went to CVS and did a little experiment. I grabbed a mask off the shelf, flipped it over, and guess what? The back of the package said it doesnāt protect against any illness, airborne or otherwise. So, Iām staring at this packaging, thinking, āThis is the best joke Iāve seen all year,ā and by 2020 standards, thatās saying something. But itās written right there in black and whiteā¦ and FACTS are a thing that can be provenāunlike the fantasy land where some health officers seem to live.
SaveCalifornia account on Instagram compiled these studies:
An April 2023 German study revealed that "using a face mask during pregnancy may increase the chance of stillbirth, testicular dysfunction, and cognitive decline in children."
An Aug. 2023 South Korea study "suggests the āgold standardā surgical N95 masks may expose users to dangerous levels of toxic chemicals."
An April 2021 study done under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) "showed that masks do absolutely nothing to help prevent the spread of COVID-19 and their use is even harmful."
In Sept. 2023, the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (AAPS) "released a statement challenging the effectiveness and ethicality of mask mandates for respiratory viruses, including COVID-19. The AAPS argues that not only are these mandates ineffective in stopping the spread of respiratory viruses, but they also pose potential health risks and infringe upon individualsā rights to informed medical consent."
The AAPS statement also delved into the potential harm that can result from prolonged mask usage. Drawing on over 60 studies and reports, it listed several areas of concern:
Prolonged use of mask is not a neutral event and in fact can cause harm. āProlonged use of N95 and surgical masks by healthcare professionals during COVID-19 has caused adverse effects such as headaches, rash, acne, skin breakdown, and impaired cognition in the majority of those surveyed.ā
Findings indicate that wearing the N95 mask for 14 hours significantly affected the physiological, biochemical, and perception parameters in a negative fashion.
The possibility that masks hinder the acquisition of speech and language in children exists. āOverall, the research to date demonstrates that the visible articulations that babies normally see when others are talking play a key role in their acquisition of communication skills."
Despite all this evidence proving the inefficacy and harms of masks for the general public, starting November 1st and continuing through April 2025, the mask requirements will return in these Bay Area counties (because apparently, viruses follow a strict calendar now.) They roll it out for healthcare workers first, but donāt be surprised when it creeps into your local restaurants, Ubers, and grocery stores. Incrementalism at its finest.
Oh, and speaking of incrementalism, this whole thing is conditioning you to jump when the health officer says so. Theyāre conditioning you to fall in line with every new order they roll out, as if these health officers have the power to control your personal health decisions. The reality is that health officers can recommend public measures, but they canāt control individual behavior beyond those recommendations.
Sure, they can issue an order, but guess what? In California, that order is only good for seven days. After that, your lovely county Board of Stupidvisors ahem, Supervisors has to vote to keep it going. Yep, just five people deciding for millions based on circumstantial evidence at best and zero evidence at worst.
FDA Facts on Masks
Weāve all seen this type of mask before ^ You know, the same mask that is always dangling from a rearview mirror, shoved in a pocket, crumpled in a purse, or hanging around someoneās chin? Super sanitary, right?
Hereās a fun fact: according to the FDA, most masks, like those disposable ones people use endlessly, are meant for one-time use. Yes, thatās rightādisposable.
Now, I may not be your English teacher, but I am an English teacher. Letās have a little vocabulary moment with the word disposable, shall we?
Go ahead, think of an adjective for it. Iāll waitā¦
Does it mean you rotate it between your pocket, chin, and car dashboard for weeks? Nope! Disposable is like a Kleenexāyou use it once, then toss it out. You wouldnāt blow your nose in a tissue, stuff it in your pocket, and pull it out for round two, and three... would you?
And speaking of Kleenex, when I sneeze, Iāll gladly oblige humanity by using one. I might even cough into it. Then, like a decent person, I throw it away, rather than wear it on my face for hours. Iām just following the logic here!
The FDA classifies masks as loose-fitting devices, designed to create a barrier between your mouth and nose and potential contaminants. Most of these masks arenāt regulated for medical use. They're not designed to form a proper seal around your nose and mouth. Thatās where the fancy N95s come in.
Hereās the punchline about N95 masks: you have to be fitted for one. You canāt just slap it on and call it a day. In hospitals, they actually do a whole fit test to make sure it works properly and that the person can tolerate it. Iāve never been through one, and frankly, I donāt plan to, but I imagine theyāre checking your heart rate, oxygen levels, and whether youāre about to pass out from lack of air. You know, key indicators that maybeājust maybeāyou canāt tolerate wearing it.
And guess what? If you have any respiratory or heart issues, or just general trouble breathing, the FDA recommends you consult a healthcare provider before using an N95. Why? Because it can make it harder to BREATHE. Ironic, right? Weāre talking about an alleged respiratory virus, which has the potential to make breathing difficult, and the solution is... something that makes breathing even more difficult?
Even the FDA spells it out, folks, with all those big, important adjectives: SPECIFICALLY, SINGLE-USE, DISPOSABLE respiratory protective devices worn by healthcare personnel DURING PROCEDURES.
Let's pause for dramatic effect on "disposable" again. These things are designed for a one-time show, not a daily marathon. A healthcare worker should not be wearing the same mask repeatedly? AND āduring proceduresāānot while they're strolling the halls or in the break room!
But of course, some of these healthcare systems have policies in place that if youāre in the break room, your office, or the cafeteriaāno mask required. Because, naturally, the cooties know better than to enter these sacred spaces. Itās genius. Truly. I mean, viruses are apparently smart enough to avoid areas where youāre buying a Snickers bar or printing out medical records.
Oh, and letās not forgetāif youāre one of the many who lined up for the ācocktail,ā you still have to cover up.
All snark aside, in response to your boss telling you to mask up, why not offer to do one better? Instead of masking up, tell your boss youāll just stay home when youāre feeling unwell. If youāre sick, just stay home. Thatās my revolutionary advice.
But if you do go to work, maybe you should ask for a list of all the people youāve supposedly infected in the past few years so you can send out some heartfelt condolence cards.
Remember, these health officers donāt have the power to run your life. They canāt stop you from not wearing a mask if thatās your choice. At the end of the day, itās your health, your body, and your decision. But, of course, theyāll keep pushing until you give in. The question is: will you? How much of your freedom are you willing to hand over?
Make way once again for the virtue signallers! š
https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/01/slow-covid-19-more-americans-need-wear-n-95-masks-indoors-column/3278779001/
Pierre Kory, USA Today, July 1, 2020, one of the self-professed "five smartest guys in the pandemic::
"The fact that the maximal exhaled viral load of infected persons occurs before the development of actual symptoms should concern all who might come into close indoor proximity with maskless presymptomatic 'super spreaders'."
--------
Here is an extended pull quote from PIERRE KORY, your Joe Rogan starring FREEDOM WARRIOR:
š
As intensive care unit specialists in New York City, we are concerned about the increasing rates of COVID-19 infection, which may once again overwhelm our hospitals, in parts of the United States.
The severity, morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 must be re-emphasized to all, both young and old, as it spares neither. To avoid a catastrophic repeat of the initial surge, we recommend a population-wide intervention ā a significant increase in the use of N95 masks ā that might allow for a safer reopening of the U.S economy.
SARS-CoV-2 was thought to be primarily transmissible via large fluid-filled droplets generated by coughing or sneezing. Those droplets usually travel short distances before falling and will not reach another person practicing social distancing nor penetrate standard (cloth or surgical) masks.
However, it has recently been determined that a major mode of transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is via aerosol droplets, exhaled by presymptomatic, asymptomatic or symptomatic persons. These small aerosol particles remain airborne indoors for extended periods and can infect those nearby who inhale them into their lungs.
We believe that the lack of emphasis placed on the prevention of aerosol droplet transmission is a major contributor to the rising case numbers in many areas of our country.
What can be done to prevent the inhalation of these aerosols and therefore reduce the spread of SARS-CoV-2? The only mask that can prevent aerosol-size droplet inhalation is an N95.
-----
Too few Americans wearing masks
Here is the key: Standard masks, although only partially effective in blocking inhalation of aerosols compared with the near perfect blocking performance of medical grade N95 masks used in hospitals, are highly effective at trapping the large droplets exhaled by infected people.
These large particles downsize to aerosol size after emission when they undergo evaporative loss. Although standard masks are imperfect in both blocking or trapping, their combined performance when worn by both infected and noninfected persons leads to a low likelihood of transmission.
The key point is that, for standard masks to be effective, there needs to be near universal wearing of these masks by all persons when in any poorly ventilated, air-recirculated, confined indoor, or highly congested outdoor environment. Conversely, emphasizing mask wearing in fresh air outdoor settings has no epidemiologic support and thus makes little sense.
Unfortunately, in some parts of the United States, the proportion of citizens routinely wearing standard masks in at-risk environments is nowhere near what's required to prevent spread. The fact that the maximal exhaled viral load of infected persons occurs before the development of actual symptoms should concern all who might come into close indoor proximity with maskless presymptomatic āsuper spreaders.ā