$495 VIP guidance is out of my budget Ms Peggy. I am going through discrimination this year since the CEO has personal conflict of interests and i have faced false accusations to discredit my reputation. I was advised by someone to leave and find another place to work. Easy to say when it is not happening to them. I do have to seek legal counsel and go from there. Anyone have a link to employment lawyers or civil rights lawyers, ai would appreciate it.
If I understand this correctly, this Supreme Court ruling should apply to another issue brought about by the "woke" group: gender designations and pronouns. While certainly not as devastating as the Civic restrictions, this issue has nevertheless cost people jobs and even entered the legal realm. If I truly believe that God created them "make and female," as Jesus proclaimed, then is it not an assault on my beliefs to force me to acknowledge a person as "their," as a condition of remaining employed? This opens up a whole area of the woke mentality vs God, morality, and logic.
Thanks for this update, Peggy. I imagine that this ruling now sets a precedent in which "public accommodations" cannot enforce masking (and other such restrictions) on their patrons.
I would assume a business can refuse to serve customers based on them being non-masked or unvaccinated or on any other criterion except for the enumerated protected characteristics. Is it so?
Michael, it's not the case, at least in California. They are supposed to follow the letter of the law. Since any and all non-legislated "mandates," "orders," "edicts," or even "private business store policy" do not override the law, they are required to provide "full benefits and services."
I even wrote to Trader Joe's general counsel at the end of 2020, when all of a sudden, our local store started refusing entrance to my husband and myself because we don't wear masks. They were trying to tell us that having a store employee shop for our list of items while we waited in our vehicle was a "reasonable accommodation," and I was tired of being treated like a dog.
Within a couple of months, the store followed all my advice — because I called them out on breaking the law on many fronts — and they not only stopped enforcing the fake mandates, they took down all the ridiculous signage inside and outside the store. I'm sure that I'm not the only one who took such action, but I will say that my 7-page letter was fully researched and well-written. I also made it abundantly clear that I would take appropriate legal action against the corporation if it did not go back to adhering to the law.
Thank you Sharine, this is interesting and better than I thought. Could you point me to the California law that requires private business to “provide full benefits and services “ to all customers regardless of their store policy? That would certainly be a surprise to the business who require customers to wear shoes or who “reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason”
Well, there you go, Peggy jumped in below and shared the link to her fabulous channel on YT! I encourage you to check it out, Michael.
Peggy's research and her videos were SO HELPFUL to me and to many other people during that nightmare, and she continues to work for all of The Great Creator's children and for Mother Earth.
$495 VIP guidance is out of my budget Ms Peggy. I am going through discrimination this year since the CEO has personal conflict of interests and i have faced false accusations to discredit my reputation. I was advised by someone to leave and find another place to work. Easy to say when it is not happening to them. I do have to seek legal counsel and go from there. Anyone have a link to employment lawyers or civil rights lawyers, ai would appreciate it.
Thank you for this!
You Rock Peggy!!!
Love you Sister in Christ!!!
If I understand this correctly, this Supreme Court ruling should apply to another issue brought about by the "woke" group: gender designations and pronouns. While certainly not as devastating as the Civic restrictions, this issue has nevertheless cost people jobs and even entered the legal realm. If I truly believe that God created them "make and female," as Jesus proclaimed, then is it not an assault on my beliefs to force me to acknowledge a person as "their," as a condition of remaining employed? This opens up a whole area of the woke mentality vs God, morality, and logic.
God bless you, Peggy❣️😇
Thanks for this update, Peggy. I imagine that this ruling now sets a precedent in which "public accommodations" cannot enforce masking (and other such restrictions) on their patrons.
I would assume a business can refuse to serve customers based on them being non-masked or unvaccinated or on any other criterion except for the enumerated protected characteristics. Is it so?
Michael, it's not the case, at least in California. They are supposed to follow the letter of the law. Since any and all non-legislated "mandates," "orders," "edicts," or even "private business store policy" do not override the law, they are required to provide "full benefits and services."
I even wrote to Trader Joe's general counsel at the end of 2020, when all of a sudden, our local store started refusing entrance to my husband and myself because we don't wear masks. They were trying to tell us that having a store employee shop for our list of items while we waited in our vehicle was a "reasonable accommodation," and I was tired of being treated like a dog.
Within a couple of months, the store followed all my advice — because I called them out on breaking the law on many fronts — and they not only stopped enforcing the fake mandates, they took down all the ridiculous signage inside and outside the store. I'm sure that I'm not the only one who took such action, but I will say that my 7-page letter was fully researched and well-written. I also made it abundantly clear that I would take appropriate legal action against the corporation if it did not go back to adhering to the law.
Thank you Sharine, this is interesting and better than I thought. Could you point me to the California law that requires private business to “provide full benefits and services “ to all customers regardless of their store policy? That would certainly be a surprise to the business who require customers to wear shoes or who “reserve the right to refuse service to anyone for any reason”
Well, there you go, Peggy jumped in below and shared the link to her fabulous channel on YT! I encourage you to check it out, Michael.
Peggy's research and her videos were SO HELPFUL to me and to many other people during that nightmare, and she continues to work for all of The Great Creator's children and for Mother Earth.
It's Civil Code 51, 52, 53, 54 and others.
I have been teaching on this law for the last 3 years. Please enjoy my many videos on my youtube channel about this: https://www.youtube.com/@thehealthyamericanpeggyhall