Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Christian's avatar

I am a retired detective with extensive experience investigating shootings, attempted murders, and homicides throughout my career. My detective instincts have always served me well. However, the assassination of CK raises several questions. After watching the video, it appeared staged to me. I suspect CK was instructed to step down and that his character would be written off. The official narrative claiming that a sniper assassinated CK does not seem credible.

Furthermore, CK's security team failed to follow basic security threat assessments, which is perplexing. Additionally, the fact that the crime scene was not preserved and secured, along with the removal of cameras, raises significant concerns. Why is the FBI involved in this case? Did the local law enforcement agency hand over CK's homicide investigation to the FBI, and if so, why and under what authority?

Also, a .30 caliber rifle bullet would typically create a massive exit wound, yet no bullet was recovered, which is unusual. While my opinion may change as new information arises, at this moment, I believe CK's assassination was a staged event.

BigBlueSky's avatar

My friend's son goes to UVU and was at the event sitting in front right in the line of sight of where Charlie was. Charlie Kirk's death was not faked. I just spoke with my friend and she said that her son witnessed Charlie's head jerk back violently and watched him losing his life. He's completely traumatized. If you don't think that whoever planned Charlie's assassination wouldn't take the time to make sure to sow confusion after-the-fact so that Charlie didn't become a martyr for those who believe in truth, I don't even know what to say. You're welcome to message me--I may be able to get you in touch with the young man I just talked about if you have any questions for him that might help you gain some clarity.

61 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?