Vaccines in FOOD & The Microbiome Agenda

Many of you emailed me with great concerns about the news of cattle being injected with mRNA, but did you know that this sort of meddling with the food supply has been going on for decades? The vast majority of beef, poultry, and even fish sold in supermarkets have already been vaccinated. Last year, I sounded the alarm about the mass trout slaughter in California, which was quite fishy because it coincided with so many of these widespread food supply "disruptions."

Then just last week, I shared more about vaccines in food, in my video here:

The disturbing mass vaccination campaigns in animals (and the various methods of vaccination) prompted me to revisit this topic in more detail, and I feel compelled to bring to your attention a new proposed House Bill in Missouri that would amend an existing law by adding three new sections requiring disclosures for certain products. These proposed amendments to require disclosures for gene therapy products have been widely praised. Here is an excerpt from Missouri House Bill 1169:

“Any product that has been created to act as, or exposed to processes that could result in the product potentially acting as, a gene therapy or that could otherwise possibly impact, alter, or introduce genetic material or a genetic change into the user of the product, individuals exposed to the product, or individuals exposed to others who have used the product shall be conspicuously labeled with the words "Potential Gene Therapy Product" unless the product is known to be a gene therapy product.”

Let me know what you think of this bill in a comment below. (And a HUGE thank you to all of those who have opted for a paid subscription to my substack. Your support is so appreciated and help me continue this important work!)

You likely know that many packaged meals and products already bear the label "GMO" (genetically modified organism) or "GE" (genetically engineered), and chances are you've eaten GMO junk foods at some point in your life. It’s no secret that a diet high in fast food, candy, and junk snacks has an effect on your genes in some capacity, but I am far more concerned about the other vaccine methods of delivery for mass production than I am about ingesting it through food. It’s clear the evildoers are desperate to get these "therapies" into the masses, which is why there are numerous vaccine delivery mechanisms.

That’s right: the bad guys want to get the poison cocktails into your system in any route possible: not only injections, but through sprays, patches, pills and “forced pressure” through a type of gun-delivery method. I DECLINE!

Note: That’s why when you apply for a religious exemption, you have to make it clear that you are against any and all forms of vaccination, including but not limited to injections, tablets, patches, and sprays.

Known Methods of Vaccine delivery:

• Intranasal Route

• Oral Route

• Subcutaneous and Intramuscular Injections

There are also other lesser known methods of vaccination like “microneedle” patches and edible vaccines; and apparently when it comes to vaccinating fish, no needle is necessary. The fish are literally dipped in contaminated vaccine water.

“Immersion vaccination involves immersion of fish in water containing vaccine antigens. Dip vaccination is rapid, as the fish are immersed in water containing a relatively high dose of vaccine antigen(s) for one or several minutes, or, if bath vaccinated, the fish receive a more diluted vaccine antigen preparation for a longer period. Fish can be booster vaccinated by dip or bath in order to increase protection. Immersion vaccination is suitable for mass vaccination of fish too small for high throughput injection vaccination.”

When I broke the story about the 350,000 trout in California that were going to be euthanized, I had no idea the fish were “immersed” or injected with vaccines.

Here is what I thought was the most interesting part about the news release from the California Department of Fish & Wildlife:

“Lactococcus petauri occurs naturally in the environment and is usually spread by movement of fish or eggs. CDFW’s fish pathologists believe that it may have been carried into the hatcheries by birds that picked it up from an environmental source.”

So it's a "naturally occurring" bacteria, but nobody knows how or why it got there. A theory, if you will.

“Fish that are infected with the bacterium can show symptoms including bulging eyes, lethargic or erratic swimming and increased mortality, or be asymptomatic and show no signs of infection depending on several factors including water temperature and stress.

Fish-to-human transmission of this bacteria is rare and unlikely. As always, anglers should follow USDA recommendations on cooking fish to an internal temperature of 145 degrees F.”

To put it simply, they want to kill over 350,000 fish because of a "naturally" occurring bacteria of unknown origin that is rare and unlikely to affect humans, and the fish can be "infected" but asymptomatic… seems legitimate. That explanation sounds a lot like the "cooties" story.

Through my research, I also found out that the vaccination of fish has been carried out for over 50 YEARS.

Check out this article on Pubmed: “A Review of Fish Vaccine Development Strategies: Conventional Methods and Modern Biotechnological Approaches”

“Most licensed fish vaccines have traditionally been inactivated microorganisms that were formulated with adjuvants and delivered through immersion or injection routes. Live vaccines are more efficacious, as they mimic natural pathogen infection and generate a strong antibody response, thus having a greater potential to be administered via oral or immersion routes. Modern vaccine technology has targeted specific pathogen components, and vaccines developed using such approaches may include subunit, or recombinant, DNA/RNA particle vaccines.”

The keyword that I want to focus on is “microorganism.” Anyone recall when the Obama Administration set aside billions of dollars for synthetic biology research and development in order to advance microbiome science?

Now, before we go on, I want to acknowledge that the word “microbiome” has been popping up a lot in our discussions of health, disease, illness and treatment.

The theory of the Microbiome was first introduced in 1988, and it refers to the microorgnisms (also called microbes) in a particular environment, such as the body or part of the body.

The concept is that microbes consist of bacteria, fungi and viruses present in our body, and that these microbes themselves help to ward off disease and illness.

My concern — and yours should be as well — is that the government is deeply involved in creating synthetic (artificial) microbes.

… and anything the government is pushing this hard, I am skeptical about!

Read on for more details: